On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 05:01:24PM -0700, Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 08:42:55PM -0000, Rafael Espindola via cfe-commits 
> > wrote:
> >> Author: rafael
> >> Date: Tue Mar 20 13:42:55 2018
> >> New Revision: 328040
> >> 
> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=328040&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> Set dso_local on string literals.
> >
> > I wonder if unnamed_addr shouldn't imply that in general?
> 
> I don't think so. For example, a language where functions cannot be
> compared for equality could mark all functions unnamed_addr. It could
> still support interposition, which requires that they are not dso_local.

I don't think that argument makes sense. The address is not named, that
strongly implies that can't be interpositioned either.

Joerg
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to