MaskRay marked 4 inline comments as done.
MaskRay added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clangd/FuzzyMatch.cpp:230
 void FuzzyMatcher::buildGraph() {
+  Scores[0][0][Miss] = Scores[0][0][Match] = {0, Miss};
   for (int W = 0; W < WordN; ++W) {
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> MaskRay wrote:
> > sammccall wrote:
> > > why this change?
> > > this has also been moved from the cheaper constructor to the more 
> > > expensive per-match call. (also the diagonal assignment added in the next 
> > > loop)
> > > 
> > > Also, shouldn't [0][0][Match] be AwfulScore?
> > > 
> > "The more expensive per-match call" is just two value assignments.
> > 
> > I have removed the expensive table initialization in the constructor.
> > 
> > [0][0][*] can be any value.
> > "The more expensive per-match call" is just two value assignments.
> Oops, sorry - by "more expensive" I mean "called thousands of times more 
> often".
> 
> > I have removed the expensive table initialization in the constructor.
> I don't want to be rude, but I asked why you changed this, and you didn't 
> answer. Unless there's a strong reason, I'd prefer to revert this change, as 
> I find this harder to reason about.
> (Roughly: in the old version of the code, any data that didn't need to change 
> for the life of the object was initialized in the constructor. That way I 
> didn't need to worry what was performance-critical and what wasn't - match() 
> only did what was strictly necessary).
> 
> > [0][0][*] can be any value.
> Can you please explain why?
> Oops, sorry - by "more expensive" I mean "called thousands of times more 
> often".

It is true that `Scores[0][0][Miss] = Scores[0][0][Match] = {0, Miss};` is the 
cost incurred for each word.

But **it is not full table initialization**, it is just two variable 
assignments. And we will assign to other values of the first row 
`Scores[0][*][*]` in the following loop. The old scatters the table 
construction to **two places**, the constructor and this dynamic programming 
site.


Repository:
  rCTE Clang Tools Extra

https://reviews.llvm.org/D44720



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to