asb added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44888#1058257, @asb wrote:
> Could you please add a test? Given that the current version of > https://reviews.llvm.org/D44886 enables linker relaxation by default in the > backend, shouldn't -mno-relax cause -relax to be set? Sorry, I misready D444886. Still, we should do Features.push_back("-relax") at least in the case where -mno-relax is given explicitly, meaning we don't have to rely on the backend default. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D44888 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits