Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45444#1063291, @JonasToth wrote:
> > It'll be good idea to have option to apply this check for > > pointer/references only, or include built-in types/enums. > > Agreed. I aim at a `mark handles const`(default on), `mark values > const`(default on for objects), `mark pointer (const int * >> const <<) > const` (default off) > > What do you mean by built-in types/enums? That they are configurable separate > to objects? I meant integers/floating point numbers/Boolean/enums. It may be overkill to apply this check for legacy code base in single pass. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D45444 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
