> On Apr 9, 2018, at 3:47 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatan...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 1:25 PM, John McCall <rjmcc...@apple.com 
>> <mailto:rjmcc...@apple.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 3:54 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatan...@apple.com 
>>> <mailto:ahatan...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 12:39 PM, John McCall <rjmcc...@apple.com 
>>>> <mailto:rjmcc...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 4, 2018, at 7:37 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatan...@apple.com 
>>>>> <mailto:ahatan...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2018, at 4:24 PM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits 
>>>>>> <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Apr 4, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk 
>>>>>>> <mailto:rich...@metafoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Akira,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This change has broken the C++ versions of these type traits for 
>>>>>>> classes with volatile members. Such classes are required to claim to be 
>>>>>>> trivial per C++ DR 2094 
>>>>>>> (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2094 
>>>>>>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2094>) 
>>>>>>> but return false from isNonTrivialToPrimitiveCopy().
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Oh that’s right. The function returns false when 
>>>>>> isNonTrivialToPrimitiveCopy() returns PCK_VolatileTrivial. That is wrong.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also, exposing these __has_* traits more widely seems like a backwards 
>>>>>>> step to me: these traits are deprecated, near-useless, and we're trying 
>>>>>>> to remove them. No code should be using them under any circumstances; 
>>>>>>> the __is_* traits should be used instead.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The __is_* traits (is_trivially_copy_constructible, etc.) are templates 
>>>>>> defined in libcxx, so it seems that we can’t use them when compiling in 
>>>>>> C mode. Is it OK to add their definitions to TokenKinds.def as non-C++ 
>>>>>> keywords?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Or perhaps redefine the six __has_* traits used here as non-C++ (KEYNOCXX 
>>>>> or ‘KEYC99 | KEYC11') keywords?
>>>> 
>>>> I think Richard is talking about e.g. the __is_trivially_destructible 
>>>> intrinsic type trait function rather than std::is_trivially_destructible.
>>>> 
>>>> Do we have a concrete need to expose these type traits to C?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> No, no one has asked any of these type traits to be exposed to C yet. Do 
>>> you think we should just revert the patch and wait until someone asks for 
>>> those type traits to be available in C?
>> 
>> I think that would be fine.  Although it would be nice if we could save the 
>> part of the patch that makes the trait logic sensitive to the type queries 
>> instead of needing to include duplicated checks for __strong, __weak, and 
>> whatever other non-trivial C features we eventually add.
>> 
> 
> Reverted r329289 in r329608. I wasn’t sure which part of the patch should be 
> saved. I don’t think we need to check the properties of the types calling the 
> QualType::isNonTrivialTo* functions since we aren’t exposing the type traits 
> to C anymore?

I mean that it would be nice if the queries could just consider the primitive 
type properties in the non-record case instead of having explicit extra checks 
for __strong/__weak and so on.

John.

> 
>> John.
>> 
>>> 
>>>> John.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 27 March 2018 at 17:12, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits 
>>>>>>> <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Author: ahatanak
>>>>>>> Date: Tue Mar 27 17:12:08 2018
>>>>>>> New Revision: 328680
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=328680&view=rev 
>>>>>>> <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=328680&view=rev>
>>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>>> [ObjC] Make C++ triviality type traits available to non-trivial C
>>>>>>> structs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> r326307 and r327870 made changes that allowed using non-trivial C
>>>>>>> structs with fields qualified with __strong or __weak. This commit makes
>>>>>>> the following C++ triviality type traits available to non-trivial C
>>>>>>> structs:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> __has_trivial_assign
>>>>>>> __has_trivial_move_assign
>>>>>>> __has_trivial_copy
>>>>>>> __has_trivial_move_constructor
>>>>>>> __has_trivial_constructor
>>>>>>> __has_trivial_destructor
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> rdar://problem/33599681 <rdar://problem/33599681>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44913 
>>>>>>> <https://reviews.llvm.org/D44913>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Added:
>>>>>>>     cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/non-trivial-struct-traits.m
>>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>>     cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def
>>>>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def
>>>>>>> URL: 
>>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def?rev=328680&r1=328679&r2=328680&view=diff
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def?rev=328680&r1=328679&r2=328680&view=diff>
>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def (original)
>>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def Tue Mar 27 17:12:08 
>>>>>>> 2018
>>>>>>> @@ -433,12 +433,12 @@ TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_nothrow_assign, HasNo
>>>>>>>  TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_nothrow_move_assign, HasNothrowMoveAssign, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>>  TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_nothrow_copy, HasNothrowCopy, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>>  TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_nothrow_constructor, HasNothrowConstructor, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> -TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_assign, HasTrivialAssign, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> -TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_move_assign, HasTrivialMoveAssign, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> -TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_copy, HasTrivialCopy, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> -TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_constructor, HasTrivialDefaultConstructor, 
>>>>>>> KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> -TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_move_constructor, 
>>>>>>> HasTrivialMoveConstructor, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> -TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_destructor, HasTrivialDestructor, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> +TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_assign, HasTrivialAssign, KEYALL)
>>>>>>> +TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_move_assign, HasTrivialMoveAssign, KEYALL)
>>>>>>> +TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_copy, HasTrivialCopy, KEYALL)
>>>>>>> +TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_constructor, HasTrivialDefaultConstructor, 
>>>>>>> KEYALL)
>>>>>>> +TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_move_constructor, 
>>>>>>> HasTrivialMoveConstructor, KEYALL)
>>>>>>> +TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_trivial_destructor, HasTrivialDestructor, KEYALL)
>>>>>>>  TYPE_TRAIT_1(__has_virtual_destructor, HasVirtualDestructor, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>>  TYPE_TRAIT_1(__is_abstract, IsAbstract, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>>  TYPE_TRAIT_1(__is_aggregate, IsAggregate, KEYCXX)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
>>>>>>> URL: 
>>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp?rev=328680&r1=328679&r2=328680&view=diff
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp?rev=328680&r1=328679&r2=328680&view=diff>
>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp (original)
>>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp Tue Mar 27 17:12:08 2018
>>>>>>> @@ -4513,6 +4513,8 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema
>>>>>>>      // does not correctly compute triviality in the presence of 
>>>>>>> multiple special
>>>>>>>      // members of the same kind. Revisit this once the g++ bug is 
>>>>>>> fixed.
>>>>>>>    case UTT_HasTrivialDefaultConstructor:
>>>>>>> +    if (T.isNonTrivialToPrimitiveDefaultInitialize())
>>>>>>> +      return false;
>>>>>>>      // http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html 
>>>>>>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html>:
>>>>>>>      //   If __is_pod (type) is true then the trait is true, else if 
>>>>>>> type is
>>>>>>>      //   a cv class or union type (or array thereof) with a trivial 
>>>>>>> default
>>>>>>> @@ -4524,6 +4526,8 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema
>>>>>>>               !RD->hasNonTrivialDefaultConstructor();
>>>>>>>      return false;
>>>>>>>    case UTT_HasTrivialMoveConstructor:
>>>>>>> +    if (T.isNonTrivialToPrimitiveDestructiveMove())
>>>>>>> +      return false;
>>>>>>>      //  This trait is implemented by MSVC 2012 and needed to parse the
>>>>>>>      //  standard library headers. Specifically this is used as the 
>>>>>>> logic
>>>>>>>      //  behind std::is_trivially_move_constructible (20.9.4.3).
>>>>>>> @@ -4533,6 +4537,8 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema
>>>>>>>        return RD->hasTrivialMoveConstructor() && 
>>>>>>> !RD->hasNonTrivialMoveConstructor();
>>>>>>>      return false;
>>>>>>>    case UTT_HasTrivialCopy:
>>>>>>> +    if (T.isNonTrivialToPrimitiveCopy())
>>>>>>> +      return false;
>>>>>>>      // http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html 
>>>>>>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html>:
>>>>>>>      //   If __is_pod (type) is true or type is a reference type then
>>>>>>>      //   the trait is true, else if type is a cv class or union type
>>>>>>> @@ -4545,6 +4551,8 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema
>>>>>>>               !RD->hasNonTrivialCopyConstructor();
>>>>>>>      return false;
>>>>>>>    case UTT_HasTrivialMoveAssign:
>>>>>>> +    if (T.isNonTrivialToPrimitiveDestructiveMove())
>>>>>>> +      return false;
>>>>>>>      //  This trait is implemented by MSVC 2012 and needed to parse the
>>>>>>>      //  standard library headers. Specifically it is used as the logic
>>>>>>>      //  behind std::is_trivially_move_assignable (20.9.4.3)
>>>>>>> @@ -4554,6 +4562,8 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema
>>>>>>>        return RD->hasTrivialMoveAssignment() && 
>>>>>>> !RD->hasNonTrivialMoveAssignment();
>>>>>>>      return false;
>>>>>>>    case UTT_HasTrivialAssign:
>>>>>>> +    if (T.isNonTrivialToPrimitiveCopy())
>>>>>>> +      return false;
>>>>>>>      // http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html 
>>>>>>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html>:
>>>>>>>      //   If type is const qualified or is a reference type then the
>>>>>>>      //   trait is false. Otherwise if __is_pod (type) is true then the
>>>>>>> @@ -4624,6 +4634,8 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema
>>>>>>>      return true;
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    case UTT_HasTrivialDestructor:
>>>>>>> +    if (T.isDestructedType() == QualType::DK_nontrivial_c_struct)
>>>>>>> +      return false;
>>>>>>>      // http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html 
>>>>>>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html>
>>>>>>>      //   If __is_pod (type) is true or type is a reference type
>>>>>>>      //   then the trait is true, else if type is a cv class or union
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Added: cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/non-trivial-struct-traits.m
>>>>>>> URL: 
>>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/non-trivial-struct-traits.m?rev=328680&view=auto
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/non-trivial-struct-traits.m?rev=328680&view=auto>
>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/non-trivial-struct-traits.m (added)
>>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/non-trivial-struct-traits.m Tue Mar 27 
>>>>>>> 17:12:08 2018
>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>>>>>>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fobjc-arc -verify %s
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +// expected-no-diagnostics
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +struct Trivial {
>>>>>>> +  int x;
>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +struct NonTrivial {
>>>>>>> +  id x;
>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +int trivial_assign[__has_trivial_assign(struct Trivial) ? 1 : -1];
>>>>>>> +int trivial_move_assign[__has_trivial_move_assign(struct Trivial) ? 1 
>>>>>>> : -1];
>>>>>>> +int trivial_copy_constructor[__has_trivial_copy(struct Trivial) ? 1 : 
>>>>>>> -1];
>>>>>>> +int trivial_move_constructor[__has_trivial_move_constructor(struct 
>>>>>>> Trivial) ? 1 : -1];
>>>>>>> +int trivial_constructor[__has_trivial_constructor(struct Trivial) ? 1 
>>>>>>> : -1];
>>>>>>> +int trivial_destructor[__has_trivial_destructor(struct Trivial) ? 1 : 
>>>>>>> -1];
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +int non_trivial_assign[__has_trivial_assign(struct NonTrivial) ? -1 : 
>>>>>>> 1];
>>>>>>> +int non_trivial_move_assign[__has_trivial_move_assign(struct 
>>>>>>> NonTrivial) ? -1 : 1];
>>>>>>> +int non_trivial_copy_constructor[__has_trivial_copy(struct NonTrivial) 
>>>>>>> ? -1 : 1];
>>>>>>> +int non_trivial_move_constructor[__has_trivial_move_constructor(struct 
>>>>>>> NonTrivial) ? -1 : 1];
>>>>>>> +int non_trivial_constructor[__has_trivial_constructor(struct 
>>>>>>> NonTrivial) ? -1 : 1];
>>>>>>> +int non_trivial_destructor[__has_trivial_destructor(struct NonTrivial) 
>>>>>>> ? -1 : 1];
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>
>>>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits 
>>>>>>> <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>
>>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits 
>>>>>> <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits>

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to