rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45476#1088189, @rsmith wrote:
> This is significantly more complexity than we need. We're talking about > constexpr variables here, so we just need a `VarDecl* -- you can then ask > that declaration for its evaluated value and emit that directly. If these variables are required to satisfy the requirements for that, then I agree that that would be the simplest solution. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45476 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
