jdenny added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45093#1087652, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> This approach generally looks good to me, but I'd like @rsmith's opinion on > whether we should be trying to make -ast-print have good source fidelity or > not. I was under the impression we wanted -ast-print to faithfully reproduce > code at least as a low priority desire, but it sounds like it may only be > intended as an approximation of the user's source code, so adding extra > machinery to support better fidelity may be more maintenance burden than it's > worth. Thanks for your comment. Give the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D45463, it seems I need a more precise understanding of the purpose of -ast-print before I write any more fixes like these. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45093 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
