efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:210
+ Arg = S.PerformCopyInitialization(Entity, SourceLocation(), Arg);
+ TheCall->setArg(I, Arg.get());
}
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> efriedma wrote:
> > Can you split this change into a separate patch? Testcase:
> >
> > ```
> > int a() {
> > const int x = 3;
> > static int z;
> > constexpr int * y = &z;
> > return []() { return __builtin_sub_overflow(x,x,y); }();
> > }```
> Can you clarify what you mean? That above testcase (with added captures)
> seems to work currently. What difference in behavior should I be expecting?
The testcase should type-check as-is, without adding any captures. Reading the
value of a constexpr variable, or a const variable of integer type, isn't an
odr-use. This doesn't work correctly at the moment because the
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions are missing from the AST. Compare to the following:
```
int a() {
const int x = 3;
static int z;
constexpr int * y = &z;
return []() { return __builtin_sub_overflow((int)x,(int)x,(int*)y); }();
}
```
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48040
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
