t.p.northover added a comment. > I'd rather not put target names in API functions. The meaning of that field > is pretty target independent ("alignment of type, before alignment > adjustments")
Except that rule only applies to aggregates. Scalar types get their alignment adjusted anyway I believe. The definition is ridiculously arbitrary. > If we use it only in ARM/AArch64 we can put a comment in that sense and maybe > rename it to `UnadjustedAlignement` or something else more descriptive than > `NaturalAlignement`? I could just about live with that (or `UnnaturalAlignment`, though perhaps best not). https://reviews.llvm.org/D46013 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits