chandlerc resigned from this revision.
chandlerc added a comment.

I don't have any problem with this patch's code in theory but:

1. The question of whether this macro approach is better or worse than 
FreeBSD's or MUSL's seems a question for libc++ maintainers, not me.
2. The question of whether this is correct for NetBSD seems for the NetBSD 
maintainer.

Since the above folks are already on the list of reviewers, I'll bow out of 
this review.



================
Comment at: include/stddef.h:55
 
 // Re-use the compiler's <stddef.h> max_align_t where possible.
 #if !defined(__CLANG_MAX_ALIGN_T_DEFINED) && !defined(_GCC_MAX_ALIGN_T) && \
----------------
Unrelated to your patch, but this comment is now amazingly out of place.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D47814



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to