ABataev added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49148#1165826, @echristo wrote:
> I think you should break it out on an option by option basis. Just warning on > "non-standard" options won't make as much sense to end users. Perhaps a "this > option is unsupported on the target you're compiling for" etc. > > Thoughts? 1. I can split it, no problems. 2. Hmm, actually this what the warning already says. If the option is not supported it says 'debug option '-xxx' is not supported for target 'xxx-xxx-xxx''. It does not seem to me like a warning on non-standard option. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D49148 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
