mclow.lists added a comment. I'd like to be clear that I'm not against using `ASSERT_NOEXCEPT` or `ASSERT_SAME_TYPE` - that's fine. But I'd rather you use `declval<>` - which is only useful in an unevaluated context, rather than having a function that takes a parameter - which someone might actually call.
Also, then you can move all the tests into `main` and get rid of the function. https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
