Hi Nic On 13/04/12 20:48, Nic Zero wrote:
> * Ignore people like Ron& me who are tempted to do rewrites > that will never have the community that CGI::App grew. Two > years from now both of our frameworks will still contain more > bugs and fewer working examples than CGI::App. My plan is that Snapp will always contain less bugs :-). > * Ron, if you do continue with Snapp, try borrowing some of > the smart ideas from Mojolicious::Lite, but > * like me, I suspect you'll fall in love with Mojolicious and > Snapp will just be an amusing memory. Quite possibly, but the code will not suffer bit rot. It definitely will be maintained. -- Ron Savage http://savage.net.au/ Ph: 0421 920 622 ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
