On 08/28/2012 11:27 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote: > I look forward to being conversation with you all more about this. I'll > set a goal to release the first code-as-draft for my proposal within a > week, and look forward to your feedback to sculpt it into a releasable > form.
I agree with just about everything you've mentioned here Mark. I've been thinking myself that C::A needed to be "reinvented" as something more modern but that still had the same flavor. My only advice is that since you'll really only have this one time to make a break like this from the past, don't feel bad about breaking backward compatibility. From your email it doesn't seem like you do, just wanted to make sure that you knew we'd support something like that. And like Gabor said, avoid the word "CGI" :) I know we've been down the naming rabbit hole before and it makes all the bikeshedders come out, a good unique, google-able name would be nice. And naming writes go to the man who does the work, so enjoy :) -- Michael Peters Plus Three, LP ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
