>> Graham Perrin wrote: >>> I did aim to add an area for myself referenced from <http://chandlerproject.org/Notes/WebHome >>>> (I am, un-official) but at a glance, that page includes or >>> comprises people who have, or had, formal associations with the >>> Project. >>> >>> Generally, what's the etiquette?
> On 8 Dec, 2008, at 06:40, Jos Yule wrote: >> About the wiki - i have to give that one to someone else - i don't >> know >> where a good place to add yourself would be... But its a great >> question. >> >> Possibly add a new section - "Contributers" below the Emeritus'? Grant Baillie wrote: > > Personally, I'd rather have current contributors (whether current or > former OSAF staff) live above "Emeritus". +1 I don't think its important to limit this section to current/former staff, though it might be handy to indicate whether or not the person has "committer"/"core team" status. Similarly, we probably want to update the "teams" page: http://chandlerproject.org/Teams/WebHome The new board members have been added (yay) -- perhaps a good idea to change up the top part of the page to reflect who is currently active in the project and what role they have, not who is staff (which is becoming a less interesting distinction). I can go ahead and do that if folks are in agreement. Cheers, Katie _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
