<http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/11/04/osaf-board-changes-and-project-next-steps/> penultimate paragraph draws attention to the November 2008 OSAF move to a mostly all-volunteer organisation.
People are listed at <http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/OSAFPeople>. Beyond the two named developers I suspect that we have many more developers within, or peripheral to, the user community. <http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/10/09/announcing-the-new-chandler-users-advisory-group/> announced the User Advisory Group (and a Chandler-UAG collection on Chandler Hub), and recognised that: > One of the challenges we face is ensuring that users continue to have a > prominent voice as a volunteer developer community emerges around the > re-architecture effort. The formation of the advisory group is a first > step towards taking on that challenge. > I am subscribed to the UAG collection. No updates there since 2008, but from <http://n2.nabble.com/Transitioning-web-resources-to-reflect-chandler2-tp2349266p2349266.html> I assume that the re-architecture is (properly) taking priority. Davor, as a founder member :) of the UAG, would you like to comment? Is that about right? Cheers Graham -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Chandler-are-you-alive---tp2492374p2501358.html Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
