What you said is all correct, Graham. Looking at the activity in the Subversion repository, Grant and Jeffrey are busy checking in their code. I am not familiar with its current state to tell you how far along it is, though. I'll ask a question on the chandler-dev list and suggest one of them post an update at a convenient point.
I am not aware of any other (volunteer) develpers participating or following the progress of the code. If any of them are on this list, maybe they can chime in with their view of the project. Davor On Wednesday 18 March 2009 23:07:18 Graham Perrin wrote: > <http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/11/04/osaf-board-changes-and-pr >oject-next-steps/> penultimate paragraph draws attention to the > November 2008 OSAF move to a mostly all-volunteer organisation. > > People are listed at > <http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/OSAFPeople>. Beyond the two > named developers I suspect that we have many more developers within, > or peripheral to, the user community. > > <http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/10/09/announcing-the-new-chandl >er-users-advisory-group/> announced the User Advisory Group (and a > Chandler-UAG collection on Chandler > > Hub), and recognised that: > > One of the challenges we face is ensuring that users continue to > > have a prominent voice as a volunteer developer community emerges > > around the re-architecture effort. The formation of the advisory > > group is a first step towards taking on that challenge. > > I am subscribed to the UAG collection. No updates there since 2008, > but from > <http://n2.nabble.com/Transitioning-web-resources-to-reflect-chandler >2-tp2349266p2349266.html> I assume that the re-architecture is > (properly) taking priority. > > Davor, as a founder member :) of the UAG, would you like to comment? > Is that about right? > > Cheers > Graham _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
