On Wednesday 03 February 2010 07:10:09 Mike Bernhardt wrote: > Great! So, how far are we from seeing the patch(es) on the production > public server (Chandler Hub)?
As early as a day or two. I'm the Hub admin, and I had to figure out a problem with Hub backups before I could probably test the patch with real Hub data. Just an hour ago I got a test instance working at "next.osaf.us" which has a recent snapshot of Hub data so people can confirm the fix actually fixes the issue. If a few people test that out and say the issue is fixed for them and any side- effects are deemed acceptable, that's all the go-ahead I need to update Hub. Your long nightmare of iCal 4.x incompatibility should then be over. Note: testing against a new hostname can be a little confusing, and it's perhaps a little dangerous for me to make an open call like this. The http://next.osaf.us/ instance is entirely separate and nothing you do there can screw up your Hub data. And any changes you make there will be thrown away. But it looks just like your real data, and you could screw up your client configuration in theory, so if you don't have a way to test two separate CalDAV accounts safely, don't do it. -- Jared _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
