It appears to work just fine for me. My needs have been pretty simple, but I can once again write both ways!
On 2/7/10 1:37 AM, Jared Rhine wrote: > On Wednesday 03 February 2010 07:10:09 Mike Bernhardt wrote: >> Great! So, how far are we from seeing the patch(es) on the production >> public server (Chandler Hub)? > > As early as a day or two. > > I'm the Hub admin, and I had to figure out a problem with Hub backups before I > could probably test the patch with real Hub data. Just an hour ago I got a > test instance working at "next.osaf.us" which has a recent snapshot of Hub > data so people can confirm the fix actually fixes the issue. > > If a few people test that out and say the issue is fixed for them and any > side- > effects are deemed acceptable, that's all the go-ahead I need to update Hub. > Your long nightmare of iCal 4.x incompatibility should then be over. > > Note: testing against a new hostname can be a little confusing, and it's > perhaps a little dangerous for me to make an open call like this. The > http://next.osaf.us/ instance is entirely separate and nothing you do there > can screw up your Hub data. And any changes you make there will be thrown > away. But it looks just like your real data, and you could screw up your > client configuration in theory, so if you don't have a way to test two > separate > CalDAV accounts safely, don't do it. > > -- Jared > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
