Agreed.  That kind of thing was really driving the decision to put any
auth near the gateway. If this thingie works well, it'd be a lot
easier to push auth out to the AP.  I'm still not sure that's a good
idea, but at least it'd be more feasible technically :)

On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've read some horror stories about bad NoCatAuth/Splash installs trapping a
> user at every network hop.
>
> Using a multi-tier approach with location specific SSIDs and using a mesh'd
> backhaul network looks like the way to go.
>
>
> On 4/3/06, Eater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I'm sure they would.  Heh :)
> >
> > Anyway, this actually sounds pretty perfectly suited to CFn.  Much
> > more so than nocat was.
> >
> > On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > The layout that it desribes is having a central authentication server.
> It
> > > might be something to load up onto Gibson.cfn and try it out.
> > >
> > > If you're volunteering to add more DB compatibility to the wifidog
> project,
> > > I'm sure they'd love you.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/3/06, Eater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Interesting.  Looks much easier to implement than nocat, honestly.  I
> > > think it's a little cumbersome to insist on authenticating against
> > > postgres, however.  I like postgres, but it'd be nice to have the
> > > option to use a simple bdb or something for small deployments.
> > >
> > > On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > http://dev.wifidog.org
> > > >
> > > > The feature set looks promising.
> > >  >
> > > >  >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > > >
> >
>


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CHAOS706.ORG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chaos706
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to