Re: Portal capture

[bandwith]

the concept is to create a second backbone network... ideally in the 5ghz range

On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

The "spares" are being used in a feasibility test currently. If this test of using two radios per location works, we'll actually get things off the ground and finally get the cantina online.

On 4/3/06, Ryan (Speed) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Looks good.
Do we have any spare WRTs
in the lolpht? I'd like to take one
home for a weekend and play with the firmware.

-Ryan

Eater wrote:
> Agreed.  That kind of thing was really driving the decision to put any
> auth near the gateway. If this thingie works well, it'd be a lot
> easier to push auth out to the AP.  I'm still not sure that's a good
> idea, but at least it'd be more feasible technically :)
>
> On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've read some horror stories about bad NoCatAuth/Splash installs trapping a
>> user at every network hop.
>>
>> Using a multi-tier approach with location specific SSIDs and using a mesh'd
>> backhaul network looks like the way to go.
>>
>>
>> On 4/3/06, Eater < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I'm sure they would.  Heh :)
>>>
>>> Anyway, this actually sounds pretty perfectly suited to CFn.  Much
>>> more so than nocat was.
>>>
>>> On 4/3/06, bandwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>>>
>>>> The layout that it desribes is having a central authentication server.
>>>>
>> It
>>
>>>> might be something to load up onto Gibson.cfn and try it out.
>>>>
>>>> If you're volunteering to add more DB compatibility to the wifidog
>>>>
>> project,
>>
>>>> I'm sure they'd love you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/3/06, Eater < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Interesting.  Looks much easier to implement than nocat, honestly.  I
>>>> think it's a little cumbersome to insist on authenticating against
>>>> postgres, however.  I like postgres, but it'd be nice to have the
>>>> option to use a simple bdb or something for small deployments.
>>>>
>>>> On 4/3/06, bandwith < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://dev.wifidog.org
>>>>>
>>>>> The feature set looks promising.
>>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>>  >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CHAOS706.ORG" group.
To post to this group, send email to chaos706@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chaos706
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---