Here is the Pesch [1986] paper.
http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/EmptyFrames.htm /Erling

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:17:58 +0100, Erling Hellenäs wrote:

> Moved the thread to chat. /Erling
>
> On 2017-12-20 19:32, Erling Hellenäs wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Thanks, I will look into the details tomorrow, but yes , and I see a
> > number of problems with this as mentioned in this post:
> >
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2017-December/050179.html
> > In this thread I am trying to discuss strategies to solve these
problems.
> > Pesch[1986] might give us relevant information about this. Thanks!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Erling Hellenäs
> >
> >
> > On 2017-12-20 17:21, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
> >>> For this to happen J functions have to be defined for handling
> >>> arrays of
> >> nothing?
> >>
> >> I have not followed this thread, or any other recent thread, closely
but
> >> this might shed some light:
> >>
> >> "
> >> Zero Frame. If the frame contains 0 (as in 3 *"1 i. 0 4), there are
no
> >> argument cells to apply v to, and the shape of a result cell (the
> >> value of
> >> sir) is indeterminate. Pesch [1986] describes a variety of
> >> strategies to
> >> address this problem. In J, the shape is calculated if v is uniform
(see
> >> below); otherwise v is applied to a cell of fills.
> >> "
> >>
> >> Rank and Uniformity Roger K.W. Hui
> >>
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/rank.htm
> >>
> >> I hope it helps
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Erling Hellenäs
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all !
> >>>
> >>> Could we avoid doing these peculiar things in the rank operator if
we
> >>> enabled the handling of arrays of nothing?
> >>>
> >>> The verb injected in Rank would then have to give a valid result
for an
> >>> array of nothing?
> >>>
> >>> For this to happen J functions have to be defined for handling
> >>> arrays of
> >>> nothing?
> >>>
> >>> Would it be possible to define an algebra for the handling of
arrays of
> >>> nothing?
> >>>
> >>> Could this be the same as enabling missing data?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Erling
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Den 2017-12-20 kl. 09:46, skrev Erling Hellenäs:
> >>>
> >>>> This is a mathematical concept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> >>>> Empty_product /Erling
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Den 2017-12-20 kl. 09:39, skrev Erling Hellenäs:
> >>>>
> >>>>> */i.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here the interpreter automatically adds a 1 to get this peculiar
> >>>>> result.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /Erling
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Den 2017-12-19 kl. 20:01, skrev Raul Miller:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> An empty tank zero array would be inconsistent.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The number of elements in an array is the product of its
> >>>>>> dimensions, and
> >>>>>> the multiplicative identity is 1, not 0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For information about J forums see
> >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> For information about J forums see
http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>
> >>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see
http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>
> >>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see
http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> >
> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see
http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to