Are you serious?  I attended a talk by Bjarne Stroustrop one memorable
April 1st where he started talking about potential extensions to C++,
including one that would make a space an operator.  He was joking, of
course.

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:50 PM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Spaces.
>
> Generally speaking, spaces indicate lower priority operations. They
> are not as strict as parenthesis, but they are still a hint.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:47 PM Devon McCormick <devon...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Why do you think the thing to right of "8÷" is anything other than "2"?
> > What rule says multiplication comes before division?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:36 AM Bernie Eckhart <
> bernie.eckhart....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > BEDMAS a.k.a. PEDMAS gives 1 imho.
> > >
> > > Surprisingly, given that Ken is in both live and, sadly after life,
> > > Canadian, my expectation is BEDMAS.
> > >
> > > Brackets (properly called "parentheses")
> > >
> > > (2+2)    i.e. (4)
> > >
> > > Giving      8   ÷   2( 4)
> > >
> > > again, this post is being written by a non-mathematician.
> > >
> > > ..........
> > > A mathematician walked into a bar.
> > > An order was pondered.
> > > An order was never placed.
> > >
> > > ..........
> > > A mathematician walked into a bar.
> > > The bartender was also a mathematician.
> > > A fight broke out.
> > >
> > > ..........
> > > BEDMAS is left to right.
> > >
> > > so what is to the right of the ÷ sign?
> > >
> > > I suggest it's an expression that evaluates to 8
> > >
> > > Big question is what rule was broken.
> > >
> > > Answer imho round brackets were not used.
> > >
> > > To my eyes, in 2(4)
> > > 2 modifies (4)
> > > yielding 8
> > >
> > > 8÷8 is 1
> > >
> > > OTOH
> > > 8 ÷ 2 x (2+2)
> > > becomes
> > > 8 ÷ 2 x (4)
> > > which becomes
> > > 4 x (4)
> > > yielding 16
> > >
> > > Rule learned in elementary school:
> > > confusion must be avoided with round brackets.
> > >
> > > non authouritative reference:
> > > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/order_of_operations
> > >
> > > On Sep 26, 2019 10:23, "'Mike Day' via Chat" <c...@jsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hardly worth commenting as it's a matter of convention,  but
> > > I did this check with my Silverfrost/Plato Fortran 95,  albeit in
> > > Fortran as I wrote it mid-20th C:
> > >
> > > Program:
> > > "
> > >        print *, 8 / 2 * (2 + 2)
> > >        end
> > > "
> > > Output:
> > > "
> > >             16
> > >
> > > Press RETURN to close window...
> > > "
> > >
> > > Also,  8 / 2 * 2 + 2 is of course 10 as far as my Fortran is concerned.
> > >
> > > How different from J and APL ... and K (mine needs updating though!):
> > > "K 2.8t 2000-08-23 Copyright (C) 1993-2000 Kx Systems
> > > Evaluation. Not for commercial use.
> > > \ for help. \\ to exit.
> > >
> > >    8 % 2 * (2 + 2)
> > > 1.0
> > >    8 % 2 * 2 + 2
> > > 1.0
> > > "
> > >
> > > Only chatting/cheating!
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 26/09/2019 06:07, Bernie Eckhart wrote:
> > > > as a non-mathemation,
> > > > seems obvious to me,
> > > >
> > > > reading left to right,
> > > > we have
> > > >
> > > > thing  divided by  an expression
> > > >
> > > > expanding the expression give 8;
> > > >
> > > > except for zero divided by zero,
> > > >
> > > > value divided by same value is AFAIK
> > > > always ONE,
> > > >
> > > > if this were a sentence,
> > > > 8 is the subject
> > > > divided by is the verb, and
> > > > 2(2+2) is the object.
> > > >
> > > > On Sep 25, 2019 04:28, "R.E. Boss" <r.e.b...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-math-behind-a-faster-multiplication-algorithm-20190923/
> > > > “This summer, battle lines<
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> https://twitter.com/pjmdolI/status/1155598050959745026?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1155598050959745026&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2019%2F08%2F02%2Fscience%2Fmath-equation-pedmas-bemdas-bedmas.html
> > > >
> > > > were drawn over a simple math problem: 8 ÷ 2(2 + 2) = ? If you
> divide 8
> > > by
> > > > 2 first, you get 16, but if you multiply 2 by (2 + 2) first, you get
> 1.
> > > So,
> > > > which answer is right? The conflict grew so heated that it made the
> pages
> > > > of The New York Times<
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/02/science/math-equation-pedmas-bemdas-bedmas.html
> > > >.
> > > > And as the comments section shows, even a professional mathematician
> > > > weighing in on the matter wasn’t enough to bring the two sides
> together.”
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > R.E. Boss
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Devon McCormick, CFA
> >
> > Quantitative Consultant
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>


-- 

Devon McCormick, CFA

Quantitative Consultant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to