A natural language is a language which people use to talk with each other,

In this context, an artificial language is a set of symbols which
people use to configure machines.

I hope this helps,

--
Raul


On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:50 AM Justin Paston-Cooper
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> All languages are fixed over a given Planck time. What is it for a language
> to be artificial or not? Can it be objectively proved either way?
>
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 18:43, Hauke Rehr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Natural languages are flexible. Recipients of messages are
> > forgiving, trying to understand what you meant.
> > The rules are dynamic and at times even local or personal.
> >
> > This is much different from many artificial languages,
> > in particular from programming languages.
> > They have one set of fixed rules* (even if they are rules
> > for declaring rules); the interpreter/compiler can only
> > be told to handle a list of common mistakes but cannot
> > intelligently try to understand anything never seen before.
> >
> > Therefore I think learning should be at least somewhat different, too.
> > (And I used to learn even foreign languages by first studying
> > their grammar, then learning a thesaurus and then applying them,
> > building hopefully correct sentences. When a Spanish teacher began
> > talking to us in Spanish from the start, I was overchallenged.)
> >
> > * yes, they are evolving – but for any version, they’re fixed
> >
> > Am 17.01.21 um 16:27 schrieb Henry Rich:
> > > It gives them a wrong mental model of rank, which they must unlearn
> > > later.  This can have serious consequences,  particularly if they get
> > > the idea that u"n is 'like u with the rank set to n' (if that were true,
> > > u"1"_1 would be the same as u"_ 1, which it isn't).
> > >
> > > Ken thought you should learn J like you learn a natural language, by
> > > seeing and saying, and creating your own rules internally.  I think he
> > > was wrong when it comes to verb rank.  The idea is so new, and so
> > > subtle, that users left to themselves get it wrong.  I had one very
> > > bright student who, discovering that (,1) + 1 2 3 gave an error, found
> > > that +/ would not give an error, and ever after applied / to every
> > > verb.  He created his own rule, you see.
> > >
> > > Henry Rich
> > >
> > > On 1/17/2021 12:24 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > >> Does it really cost them that much?
> > >>
> > >> Given that beginner problems generally do not involve multi-megabytes
> > >> of data, I mean...
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------
> > mail written using NEO
> > neo-layout.org
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to