so what is wrong with that? On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:24:56PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 01:34:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > why not add a property to every key that says: pls do not remove me > > from your cache unless you 1st try to republish me to freenet? > > Because then a file would never get deleted, and the network would > simply fill up. > > Ian. _______________________________________________ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
- [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence' proposal David McNab
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Kris Van Hulle
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... hvrietsc
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- RE: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... hvrietsc
- RE: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... McMeikan, Andrew
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... David McNab
- Re: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Timm Murray
- RE: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Timm Murray
- RE: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... McMeikan, Andrew
- Re: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... Greg Wooledge
- RE: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... McMeikan, Andrew
- RE: [FreeNet-chat] Yet another damn 'permanence'... McMeikan, Andrew