Peter Koellner:
> so i would opt for an emergency break. revise the project organization,
> try to prepare a sound development environment and write enough initial
> documentation to get people on the train. also think about the prototype
> implementation platform.
I should point out that there are three levels of this project:
* Freenet. The performance and properties of the routing
technique. Documented in research papers.
* FNP. The optimal implementation of the Freenet algorithm.
Documented in specification.
* Fred. The actual node implementation. Javadocs.
There is plenty of documentation.
Anyway, the popular insults are that Fred is buggy and bloated, FNP
is overengineered and inefficient, and Freenet is vulnerable to
anonymity attacks and flooding.
Freenet does not have full-time developers. If you think it's beyond
repair, begin it again the right way. If it's fixable, fix it.
_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
