I don't doubt Matthew's abilities or dedication, but I often doubt Ian's vision, with his tendency to say things like, "If it works for Windows users, through a $50 black-box NAT router, that's 90% of the market, and that's good enough for now."
I just love it when people put words in my mouth. I'm not really sure what you are talking about here, but my "vision" for 0.7 is that it will be *at least* as easy to configure and use as any other P2P application out there, something that I don't think we would ever have achieved without the 0.7 rewrite.
Perhaps you could clarify exactly what is wrong with Freenet working out-of-the-box for 90% of our users? What is your better suggestion?
Ian.
-- Founder, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ CEO, Cematics Ltd http://cematics.com/ Personal Blog http://locut.us/~ian/blog/
_______________________________________________ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
