I was reading the other bits of this and while I don't quite understand it ( wouldn't it be great if "cough cough" I could be at one of your sprints to sync with dev plans "cough cough" especially in Taipei) ;-P
Seriously, what I do at least somewhat grok so far is the changes to remove whitelists and define those in Units. I looked over Sylvain's MP to do that for the client cert whitelist. I took the liberty of going ahead and adding a story card to do likewise for server, so I thought I'd ask if that is something we should look at soon, or put off for a bit? Cheers Jeff P.S. Really, the sidebar above was meant mostly as a joke, but I am interested in keeping up with the dev roadmap and progress for plainbox/checkbox since we are a direct consumer of / contributor to that effort. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey. It's time for another CEP-8 update: > > - All of the parser related work is now finished. There's one unmerged > revision [1] but it was already past the initial review and I expect > it to land > - I've proposed a set of new APIs for working with data from test plan > units. I've specifically changed it from what I had earlier so that > working with multiple test plans is possible. This is the CDTS > use-case but I think it's okay to do it in general. The code is fairly > tested and readable [2] though I haven't tried using it for real > - I've started rebasing my earlier bulk and unitary method on top of > that, so that it is possible to work with multiple test plans. > - We now have test plans for CDTS and Certification [3], [4] that have > been reviewed by Ara and are both ready to land as soon as [2] lands. > > Next week I'll focus on gluing this to plainbox run so that we can > verify the test report format and contents and I'll work towards > making it possible to use in checkbox-gui. The one risk there is we > need to remember (know) which test plans were pre-selected but this > knowledge, AFAIK, so far only exists in checkbox-gui (ironically). It > can be re-constructed in plainbox so I'm not worried at all, it's just > a matter of getting that done. > > Thanks > ZK > > [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zkrynicki/checkbox/cep-8/revision/3587 > [2] https://code.launchpad.net/~zkrynicki/checkbox/cep-8/+merge/250288 > [3] > https://code.launchpad.net/~sylvain-pineau/checkbox/14.04-client-testplan/+merge/249272 > [4] > https://code.launchpad.net/~sylvain-pineau/cdts/cdts_testplans/+merge/250293 > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- "Entropy isn't what it used to be." Jeff Lane - Server Certification Team Lead, Tools Developer, Warrior Poet, Lover of Pie Phone: 919-442-8649 Ubuntu Ham: W4KDH Freenode IRC: bladernr or bladernr_ gpg: 1024D/3A14B2DD 8C88 B076 0DD7 B404 1417 C466 4ABD 3635 3A14 B2DD -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
