Typing from so excuse the brevity On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Jeffrey Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > I was reading the other bits of this and while I don't quite > understand it ( wouldn't it be great if "cough cough" I could be at > one of your sprints to sync with dev plans "cough cough" especially in > Taipei) ;-P
oh, this wasn't planned AFAIR > > Seriously, what I do at least somewhat grok so far is the changes to > remove whitelists and define those in Units. Whitelists are supported forever and you don't have to take any action. It is only when you want to provide additional meta-data or acces new features will you have to worry about those. Internally we have a 1-to-1 mapping between those. > I looked over Sylvain's MP to do that for the client cert whitelist. > I took the liberty of going ahead and adding a story card to do > likewise for server, so I thought I'd ask if that is something we > should look at soon, or put off for a bit? There is no rush. Have you read CEP-8 by any chance? Thanks ZK > Cheers > Jeff > > P.S. Really, the sidebar above was meant mostly as a joke, but I am > interested in keeping up with the dev roadmap and progress for > plainbox/checkbox since we are a direct consumer of / contributor to > that effort. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey. It's time for another CEP-8 update: >> >> - All of the parser related work is now finished. There's one unmerged >> revision [1] but it was already past the initial review and I expect >> it to land >> - I've proposed a set of new APIs for working with data from test plan >> units. I've specifically changed it from what I had earlier so that >> working with multiple test plans is possible. This is the CDTS >> use-case but I think it's okay to do it in general. The code is fairly >> tested and readable [2] though I haven't tried using it for real >> - I've started rebasing my earlier bulk and unitary method on top of >> that, so that it is possible to work with multiple test plans. >> - We now have test plans for CDTS and Certification [3], [4] that have >> been reviewed by Ara and are both ready to land as soon as [2] lands. >> >> Next week I'll focus on gluing this to plainbox run so that we can >> verify the test report format and contents and I'll work towards >> making it possible to use in checkbox-gui. The one risk there is we >> need to remember (know) which test plans were pre-selected but this >> knowledge, AFAIK, so far only exists in checkbox-gui (ironically). It >> can be re-constructed in plainbox so I'm not worried at all, it's just >> a matter of getting that done. >> >> Thanks >> ZK >> >> [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zkrynicki/checkbox/cep-8/revision/3587 >> [2] https://code.launchpad.net/~zkrynicki/checkbox/cep-8/+merge/250288 >> [3] https://code.launchpad.net/~sylvain-pineau/checkbox/14.04-client-testplan/+merge/249272 >> [4] https://code.launchpad.net/~sylvain-pineau/cdts/cdts_testplans/+merge/250293 >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > -- > "Entropy isn't what it used to be." > > Jeff Lane - Server Certification Team Lead, Tools Developer, Warrior > Poet, Lover of Pie > Phone: 919-442-8649 > Ubuntu Ham: W4KDH Freenode IRC: bladernr or bladernr_ > gpg: 1024D/3A14B2DD 8C88 B076 0DD7 B404 1417 C466 4ABD 3635 3A14 B2DD >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
