On 23 Feb 2008, at 14:16, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > What do you think about that idea? > > 0.6.0 makes cherokee look like an immature software, and stops many > people from using it. > > A 1.0.0 would describe more clearly that it is a mature piece of > software (it really is), although it wouldn't > have all the features planned for the original 1.0.0 which are not > necessary for everyone.
It is a very interesting suggestion, actually. In fact, it kind of makes sense to me. On the one hand, bumping to higher release number would change the perception of some people, and that is a good thing. On the other hand, it would be kind of weird to introduce the change, and that does not sound like a smart thing to do. There might be a third option though. What if we release trunk as something 'done but not quite dusted' (thinking of cherokee-admin)? For instance, we release trunk next week as 0.99.0, and we focus on maintaining it for a few weeks before we branch it to stable. Then, we could release it as 1.0 and start working on - let's call it - 'Cherokee next'. What would you think of that? -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
