-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef: > On 23 Feb 2008, at 14:16, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > >> What do you think about that idea? >> >> 0.6.0 makes cherokee look like an immature software, and stops many >> people from using it. >> >> A 1.0.0 would describe more clearly that it is a mature piece of >> software (it really is), although it wouldn't >> have all the features planned for the original 1.0.0 which are not >> necessary for everyone. > > It is a very interesting suggestion, actually. In fact, it kind of > makes sense to me. > > On the one hand, bumping to higher release number would change the > perception of some people, and that is a good thing. On the other > hand, it would be kind of weird to introduce the change, and that does > not sound like a smart thing to do. > > There might be a third option though. What if we release trunk as > something 'done but not quite dusted' (thinking of cherokee-admin)? > For instance, we release trunk next week as 0.99.0, and we focus on > maintaining it for a few weeks before we branch it to stable. Then, we > could release it as 1.0 and start working on - let's call it - > 'Cherokee next'. > > What would you think of that?
What about 1.0.0-rc1? Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHwE5gYH1+F2Rqwn0RCu3vAJ0V2gFvP7wsLGkfVeJXdrDHgSS0OgCfZQ9P hK1hjXRY6WBAP/25HfEN0jc= =x3iL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
