On 30-oct-08, at 17:47, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Rui Lopes dijo [Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:59:30AM +0000]:
>> Iván Chavero wrote:
>>>
>> Like http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/dev_cherokee.conf.html  
>> (linked
>> from http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/)?
>
> Might I suggest moving this document from the «developer» to the
> «configuration» section? I know the official stance is that the
> configuration is handled via cherokee-admin, but sysadmins work best
> when using their regular tools. Usually, our best regular tool is
> called Emacs.


IMHO, that's some sort of layer-8 issue, really.

I like to think that Cherokee is a modern web server that has nothing  
to do with those old days procedures.  It felt cool when back in the  
nineties we edited text file in order to configure your IP address,  
but times have changed. Now, computers are easy to use (eeePCs,  
iPhones, even the Linux desktop!), everybody is connected to the  
Internet, and people do not need become gurus before they are able to  
set up a little blog on their home DSL lines.

That's basically the reason behind Cherokee-admin. So, independently  
of how good the interface currently is, I'm certain that the final  
target is right. It *is* definitely the way to go.

--
Octality
http://www.octality.com/

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to