Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 30-oct-08, at 17:47, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > >> Rui Lopes dijo [Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:59:30AM +0000]: >> >>> Iván Chavero wrote: >>> >>> Like http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/dev_cherokee.conf.html >>> (linked >>> from http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/)? >>> >> Might I suggest moving this document from the «developer» to the >> «configuration» section? I know the official stance is that the >> configuration is handled via cherokee-admin, but sysadmins work best >> when using their regular tools. Usually, our best regular tool is >> called Emacs. >> > > > IMHO, that's some sort of layer-8 issue, really. > > I like to think that Cherokee is a modern web server that has nothing > to do with those old days procedures. It felt cool when back in the > nineties we edited text file in order to configure your IP address, > but times have changed. Now, computers are easy to use (eeePCs, > iPhones, even the Linux desktop!), everybody is connected to the > Internet, and people do not need become gurus before they are able to > set up a little blog on their home DSL lines. > > That's basically the reason behind Cherokee-admin. So, independently > of how good the interface currently is, I'm certain that the final > target is right. It *is* definitely the way to go. > > -- > Octality > http://www.octality.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > > >
so .. no more cat > cherokee.conf ?? sad ... just joking .. Saludos Leonel _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
