On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:40 AM, M. David Peterson <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:04 PM, pub crawler <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I support the ideas of both the cancel/undo. >> > > Better still would be using a git-based versioning system that generates a > commit with every save, exposing the ability to revert back to a previous > revision via a simple drop-down listing the sha1 of each of the previous > commits. There are a ton of additional advantages to moving towards a > git-based system (ease of deployment of configuration files to other nodes > via git push, etc.) but this particular capability would be reason enough. > > Alvaro, your thoughts? > It's an interesting idea. It'd vote +1 as long as we managed to implement it as a weak dependency (this is, it'd also work if you did not have git installed). -- Greetings, alo http://www.octality.com/
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
