On 02/01/2012 10:32 AM, Jędrzej Nowak wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's an interesting idea. It'd vote +1 as long as we managed to implement it
> as a weak dependency (this is, it'd also work if you did not have git
> installed).
Then I need to change my opinion about that idea. But dependency less
system like that is a good idea I think. Maybe the best will be to
have something like abstract layer on top of it - then when no git /
hg use kind off 'fallback mode' ?
It's completely up to us how complex we want it to be. The question,
though, is whether it'd worth supporting more than a single version
control system.
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
