Look, i dont have any problem with the github sources. im also a developer and im also using github. i well know this... But since im not part of the developing project i dont know what is the current state and im not have time for testing.
----- Eredeti üzenet ----- Feladó: "Johannes Becker" <[email protected]> Címzett: "- -" <[email protected]> Másolatot kap: "Jędrzej Nowak" <[email protected]>, "Donka Péter" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Elküldött üzenetek: Péntek, 2012 Október 12 19:19:59 Tárgy: Re: [Cherokee] Is Cherokee Project still active? I just wanted to support all the aforementioned (stadtpirat, Péter, ...), : if it's not in aptitude, it practically doesn't exist for me. I'm not primarily a developer, but a user with limited time, I'm not going to pull github snapshots, see if and how they work, compile, ... etc. One of the awesome features of Cherokee is its graphical admin interface, which is obviously NOT geared towards hard core developers but rather casual users. So the developers should make sure that those who just want to *use* cherokee without much of a hassle can do so. Cheers from Munich, Germany, Johannes Am 12.10.2012 um 19:13 schrieb - -: If you miss pushing out major updates, over some migrating work, then you will lose users, because others don't do it like this. For me it seems, Cherokee will become a tool for nerds. (No offense) From: Jędrzej Nowak < [email protected] > To: Donka Péter < [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 6:11 PM Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Is Cherokee Project still active? Why no version ? Because read last Alvaro messages. We're in stage where migrating everything on github, creating new page, Skinkie is taking care about bugfixes in cherokee core and really believe me, you *should* use master branch instead of latest stable because it's probably more stable, or if you don't want to use latest 'cherokee core' just use latest admin & CTK because they are definitely better ritght now (some bugfixes...) Greetings, Jędrzej Nowak On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Donka Péter < [email protected] > wrote: > Then why we dont have a new version since a year now? > If the developers dont think its ready for a new release its still in testing > phase... > Maybe the latest snapshot have some bugfix but probably produce some new too, > and i dont want to be a beta tester in a big web server. My boss will take my > head off if i play with the production servers :) > > ----- Eredeti üzenet ----- > Feladó: "Jędrzej Nowak" < [email protected] > > Címzett: "Donka Péter" < [email protected] > > Másolatot kap: [email protected] > Elküldött üzenetek: Péntek, 2012 Október 12 17:53:04 > Tárgy: Re: [Cherokee] Is Cherokee Project still active? > > Well it's not testing there are a lot of fixes. Including admin fixes, > ssl fixes, some server core fixes also. > > > Greetings, > Jędrzej Nowak > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Donka Péter < [email protected] > wrote: >> i dont like the idea that using a testing phase svn snapshot in a production >> server. >> i dont want trouble :) >> >> ----- Eredeti üzenet ----- >> Feladó: "Jędrzej Nowak" < [email protected] > >> Címzett: "Donka Péter" < [email protected] > >> Másolatot kap: [email protected] >> Elküldött üzenetek: Péntek, 2012 Október 12 17:34:23 >> Tárgy: Re: [Cherokee] Is Cherokee Project still active? >> >> Well, >> >> Develotment slowed down, sure it is. >> But, there were some 'big' bugfixes in main cherokee branch (also >> please notice github repo >> https://github.com/cherokee/webserver/commits/master not old SVN one) >> and there IS activity as you can see. I would avoid sites that are >> checking 'some' websites for usage etc. >> >> If you are having that problems, really consider update to latest >> master branch (much better than current stable one). >> >> Greetings >> Jędrzej Nowak >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Donka Péter < [email protected] > wrote: >>> If you check out the last years commit, noting really important was >>> changed. just only a few bugfix and pull request. >>> Maybe the main project was not shut down but the developement is definetly >>> slowed down. >>> I was a fan of the cherokee webserver (before i was using apache for years, >>> and im never go back), but today the nginx webserver take over everything. >>> It just doesn't have any competitor on the linux platforms. >>> Nginx doesn't have own admin UI (have many third party control panel) but >>> the cherokee admin is incredible slowing down when you have hundreds of >>> websites on the same server so its totally useless anyway, and the main >>> cherokee webserver often segfault if you have so many websites. Editing the >>> cherokee.conf by hand is a horror, but i have no other choice since the >>> webUI is not working, at least i need to wait many minutes(!) before the >>> page is refreshed after my commit. >>> >>> Cherokee lost many users since the last half year and this is very bad for >>> the project. >>> see this: >>> http://trends.builtwith.com/Web-Server/Cherokee >>> >>> I feel sorry about that... >>> >>> ----- Eredeti üzenet ----- >>> Feladó: "Jędrzej Nowak" < [email protected] > >>> Címzett: "- -" < [email protected] > >>> Másolatot kap: [email protected] >>> Elküldött üzenetek: Péntek, 2012 Október 12 16:26:09 >>> Tárgy: Re: [Cherokee] Is Cherokee Project still active? >>> >>> Just check https://github.com/cherokee/webserver "9 days ago"doesn't >>> seems taht far away. >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Jędrzej Nowak >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:24 PM, - - < [email protected] > wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as far as I can see the Cherokee Project hasn't been updated since October >>>> 2011, almost one year now. It is still version 1.2.101. >>>> >>>> I just want to know if the project has been abandoned, and whether I need >>>> to >>>> keep looking for an alternative. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> oOo >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Cherokee mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cherokee mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cherokee mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >> _______________________________________________ >> Cherokee mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
