In the early 80's the 68-72 Chevelle's were the car of choice due to the rules 
and the class I ran in on our local asphalt tracks,  I went through my fair 
share of decent bodies which now I am not proud of.  I remember my best one was 
a 68, rust-free southern car but to my defense it didn't have a title.  When I 
destroyed the sheet metal, I skinned another 72 outer shell and made it work on 
the 68.  

----- Original Message ----
From: Josh Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: The Chevelle Mailing List <chevelle-list@chevelles.net>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 5:24:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Off topic, Camaro.

Kills me this is a little off the subject on the off the subject subject, but 
just a mere 7 years ago people couldn't hardly give that body style away, I 
even made a dirt tracker out of a nice 72 (nice, not perfect, no interior, no 
engine, no title, you know just nice old car).  Oh well thats what time does I 
guess......
  Josh Campbell
  66SS396 Total basketcase!!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
    I've about got my 68 Chevelle SS done, So I'm looking for something else to 
take up my time. I'm looking at a 1970 camaro, It has a small block 350 in it. 
I'm not sure of the price yet, Somewhere between $7000.000 - $9000.00  The car 
is in pretty good shape. The Question is, I have a 454 that I would like to put 
in it if I get it.  Will this engine
 drop in using the same motor mounts? And what other mods will I have to do? 
Even If the price is $9000.00 is that an OK deal for a good 1970 Camaro? I know 
that would be a steel on a SS Chevelle, But I don't know much about Camaros, 
Other than the 69 Z. Thanks for any info ahead of time....Dennis



 
      
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 






      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 

Reply via email to