i'm still on 0.8.7 and dev mode is fast enough. But u can have even more 
then 50 sec when u have a lot of rudimentary files in your project, for 
example, you change something in some.html, but u leave copy in the same 
folder some.org.hml, both copies will be compiled.

On Monday, June 30, 2014 11:55:13 AM UTC+4, graeme defty wrote:
>
> I was moving up from 0.8.5.
>
> The changes you mention may well have been the cause.
>
> I did raise the issue on the list long ago when the times ballooned out 
> but nobody seemed to have the same issue, and I did not get any clues as to 
> how to address it. That was what caused me to buy the new machine, which 
> brought the times down into the painful-but-bearable category so I let it 
> drop.
>
> One aspect of my application that may be a little unusual is that it is 
> well over 3 years old and created when CB was relatively new and very 
> differently structured from the way it looks today. I have been through 
> several major changes to the framework (e.g. in the early days CB code and 
> application code were mingled together rather than separated the way they 
> are today.) This could well mean that I have a slightly 'odd' set of 
> components.
>
> Perhaps I should have generated a new, 'empty' application and copied all 
> my code into it at some point as a complete replacement, but it seemed like 
> a lot of work and there are always user requests to be addressed. A major 
> upgrade (such as this one) is not something to be lightly undertaken.
>
> Anyway, all is well now. I am very grateful for your help.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 30 June 2014 13:23, Jesse Gumm <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> Obviously, things have changed, but what exactly has changed is hard
>> to say. What version were you migrating from that you noticed such a
>> significant improvement in migrating to 0.8.12?
>>
>> I did make some changes to the way the auto-recompilation calculated
>> when to recompile stuff, perhaps that was it - hard to say.
>>
>> 50 second page-loads are the kind of thing I'd hope to hear about as
>> soon as possible, because that's just way to slow.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Graeme Defty <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>> > BRILLIANT !
>> >
>> > Thanks Jesse - much appreciated - and from where I am standing it is a
>> > superb solution  ;-)
>> >
>> > On a totally unrelated topic . . .
>> >
>> > I have noticed a 57,000 times speedup in the performance of DEV mode. 
>> Well,
>> > I may be exaggerating a little, but some time ago I moved to an i7 
>> machine
>> > precisely because performance on my i5 became unbearably slow as my
>> > application grew. It was clear the whole thing was being recompiled 
>> every
>> > time I hit enter.  I was getting 40-50 second responses.
>> >
>> > Moving to the i7 brought that down to about 10 seconds, which was still
>> > painful, but on the plus side gave me a LOT of thinking time.  ;-)
>> >
>> > Now with CB 0.8.12 (and Erlang 17) I am getting sub-second response 
>> times,
>> > as you would expect. It's really too short to estimate by eye.
>> >
>> > Did something change? (Sorry - dumb question. I meant WHAT changed?)
>> >
>> >
>> > Anyway, thanks again
>> >
>> > g
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 30 June 2014 12:37, Jesse Gumm <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Graeme,
>> >>
>> >> I realize this is just as helpful as my last recommendation, but what
>> >> if you tried adding
>> >>
>> >> -compile({no_auto_import, [round/1]). to the top of your module?  It's
>> >> not exactly a great fix, but it might work.
>> >>
>> >> I'm curious if that would fix it.
>> >>
>> >> -Jesse
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Graeme Defty <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > . . . and finally (perhaps ;-) )
>> >> >
>> >> > I am getting the error message:
>> >> >
>> >> >     [{0,erl_lint,{call_to_redefined_old_bif,{round,1}}}]
>> >> >
>> >> > This comes from a generated function because I have a model called
>> >> > 'round',
>> >> > and the model causing the error "-belongs_to(round)".
>> >> >
>> >> > Again, this is a change in behaviour - all was well before.
>> >> >
>> >> > This may well be a change in Erlang behaviour, but I raise it here in
>> >> > case
>> >> > someone can either confirm that and/or point me to a place where 
>> there
>> >> > is a
>> >> > parameter which allows BIF redefinition.
>> >> >
>> >> > (I also realise that I can stop using the word 'round' . . . but in a
>> >> > golfing application? Which is almost 17,000 lines of erlang???  I am 
>> not
>> >> > keen for that to be the answer - LoL )
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks again for any help.
>> >> >
>> >> > g
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> > Groups
>> >> > "ChicagoBoss" group.
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send
>> >> > an
>> >> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >> >
>> >> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAKF5fiCPJH8BoMMOi8rm_DJYFBG1wDu7TKi7-%3DxAo9AC9DLXrA%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jesse Gumm
>> >> Owner, Sigma Star Systems
>> >> 414.940.4866 || sigma-star.com || @jessegumm
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups
>> >> "ChicagoBoss" group.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an
>> >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >> 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAPTXyXf6vZbhGKkrM4OUESDb8F6wpF52P3mEFuUiuKnAHyf7GQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>> >>
>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups
>> > "ChicagoBoss" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an
>> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAKF5fiAWp42EigUY58hO2Sv%3DvToc0K-QTH9BJT%3DcXNqx-91uGw%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>> >
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jesse Gumm
>> Owner, Sigma Star Systems
>> 414.940.4866 || sigma-star.com || @jessegumm
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ChicagoBoss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAPTXyXe7QTjvvk_H_TmQme22rOEBmZsnP5KpuQVqnOeqE5LmVw%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChicagoBoss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/72368b58-9de7-4322-91a9-44941c5f3eae%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to