On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:10:25PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote: > Alternately we can drop iset and just define everything > in terms of chars to begin with, but I think iset is useful.
Could you elaborate on this comment? I don't understand what you mean by "define everything in terms of chars". > The libchicken size on my machine is about 100k larger. > This should be reclaimed after the next change which > would redefine the irregex char-sets in terms of SRFI-14. > The change after that defines the utf8 egg char-sets in > terms of the core. Why did you chose to import the entire iset egg? It would make more sense to migrate the cset stuff from irregex into srfi-14 and change irregex to use srfi-14, wouldn't it? This would mean less code, overall. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
