From: Alex Shinn <alexsh...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Adding iset to core and using it for Unicode-capable SRFI-14. Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:44:27 +0900
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Peter Bex <peter....@xs4all.nl> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:02:44AM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote: >> > iset manages integer sets. The srfi-14 proposed >> > is a thin wrapper around iset, first translating chars to >> > integers. We could alternately remove the integer >> > interface and just use chars for everything. >> >> That would require an entirely different implementation, wouldn't it? >> At least, iset being based on bit-vectors wouldn't be able to >> store characters as-is. > > > Right now we have: > > (define (iset-contains? iset n) > (... <lookup> iset n ...)) > (define (char-set-contains? cset ch) > (iset-contains? cset (char->integer ch))) > > It's not a big change, but we could remove the wrapper: > > (define (char-set-contains? cset ch) > (.. <loookup> cset (char->integer ch) ...)) > > Not much actual code is removed, but we do get rid of > a whole unit and its exported bindings. That would be nice, indeed. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
