On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:06:27PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote: > One thing I noticed is that now (signum -0.0) => -0.0. Does that seem > right? If so, it may be worth documenting that it's both exactness and > sign-preserving.
It's probably correct. SBCL does the same: * (signum 0.0) 0.0 * (signum -0.0) -0.0 Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
