On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Daniel B. Faken wrote:
> I'm switching from using my own version of CHICKEN_eval_string()
> & friends to the builtin one, which is now a callback.
> When I was using my own version, I defined it in the normal top-level
> scheme file, and my eval-fn had access to all the units I included there.
> Now that I've switched, they don't (I believe they have access to the
> same units as the 'eval' library, since that is where the "boilerplate"
> embedding API now resides).
> This is not a problem - I can just call
> CHICKEN_eval_string("(declare (uses my-funny-units) ...)").
I take this back.. It seems that macros are not available
-- not even require-extension! -- in CHICKEN_eval_string() & friends.
(require 'ID) works, but if I try (include "chicken-more-macros"),
'include' is not defined either.
I know this is a tricky issue (deciding what is available without
requiring include/require/require-for-syntax), but I assume
this is not the desired behaviour?
So, maybe I'll just go back to my own 'eval', over which I have full
control (BTW, I don't think the boilerplate stuff handles multiple
s-exprs).
On another note: (require 'library) fails, even in csi:
_______ _ __
/ ___/ / (_)___/ /_____ ___
/ /__/ _ \/ / __/ '_/ -_) _ \
\___/_//_/_/\__/_/\_\\__/_//_/
Version 2, Build 106 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 - [ dload ]
(c)2000-2005 Felix L. Winkelmann
#;1> (require 'library)
Error: (require) can not load extension: library
cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
