On 4/15/06, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I was expecting that string-substitute* is > faster than calling multiple string-substitute's. > > But a simple test showed me the opposite result. > Any ideas?
Can you give me your test-input? > > BTW, string-substitute* does not have the optional argument INDEX, > which string-substitute has. What's the default behavior? > To replace all occurrences. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
