So, this actually is a correct way of using fallback, isn't it? OK, I'll look for my real problem. About the safety, don't worry too much, since this is just a temporal solution, and I already confirmed with chicken-dump that procedures in my file are only equal? and hash.
Daishi On 8/1/06, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like the s11n egg is updated. So I tried, only to see I'm > missing something. > > Here is my fallback func: > > (define (deserialize-fallback id) > (cond ((string=? id "f_3497library.scm") ; chicken-2.315 > equal?) > ((string=? id "f_6914extras.scm") ; chicken-2.315 > hash) > (else > (error "deserialize-fallback unknown id" id)))) > > What is missing? > I haven't seen your error-message yet. (But note that this is likely to fail, since the ID will probably be re-used and now name different procedures. This approach is not safe). cheers, felix -- http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
