On 7/3/07, Jong-Hyouk Yun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I found some mailings in archive.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2007-02/msg00055.html
I went through that thread, but it seems to be mostly about future
directions for a toolkit. I want to know which if any of the current
eggs are recommended - I tried Qt, but ran into a problem with the
layout managers, and PS/Tk looks promising but very badly documented
(the docs seem to assume that you are already familiar with Tcl/Tk, a
problem that has plagued every Tk binding I've seen other than Perl/Tk
(ironically, the Ruby/Tk docs said 'go look at the Perl/Tk
documentation)).
I'm not really focused on a "professional" GUI - what I need is
i. A reasonably complete set of bindings
ii. A pleasant GUI development experience (I'd use OCaml, but lablgtk
is pretty ugly)
iii. The ability to deliver native executables on Linux and Windows at
least, preferably OS X as well
martin
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
