On 8/23/07, Arto Bendiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe this is simply a case of a situation where more of the > generally useful stuff should be pushed down to Chicken's standard > library, whence all eggs could rely on that functionality always being > available (unless compiled out e.g. when installing a very minimal > Chicken).
Valid point. > > Of course, I've no idea if this really is what Felix wants to do with > Chicken. But it's at least an opportune time to be asking these kinds > of questions, given the R6RS situation. I? I don't know anything. I'm just trying not to go under and to keep things working, somehow. I don't have the time for things like plans... :-) cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
