On 8/23/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you need to make backward-incompatible changes to the API of an egg,
> make a new egg with a new name related to the old.  Then persuade people

This is similar to considering the major version number to be part of
the "name" at some level (like expat going from libexpat.so.0 to
so.1).  Every time you make incompatible changes you would increment
the version.  (Especially since the new name would tend to just be
"old-name-2" anyway, unless you think of something more creative.)


_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to