Thanks for the info, Kon. I've created a ticket to track this: http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/417
For now, I'll just special case for my needs. Cheers, -M On Jan 29, 2008 12:52 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:37 AM, John Cowan wrote: > > > Graham Fawcett scripsit: > > > >> Hm, is it just primitive C functions that need better "procedure > >> information"? It might be easier to fix that, than to build and > >> maintain a database. > > > > Really only the primitives that are also user-exposed, like + > > but unlike cons (which is not, technically, a primitive in Chicken). > > Yes. By "database" I meant something that maps ##core#primitive > procedures to "full" lambda info. Don't think it practical to change > every use of '(##core#primitive "C_foo")' when a central lookup table > can be built. > > > > > -- > > Samuel Johnson on playing the violin: John Cowan > > "Difficult do you call it, Sir? [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I wish it were impossible." http://www.ccil.org/ > > ~cowan > > Best Wishes, > Kon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > Chicken-users@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
