On Jan 29, 2008 6:25 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, it seems we need a database of the built-in's "procedure- > information". Oh well, one more todo. >
Is it really necessary to allow accessing the lambda-lists of primitives? The lambda info object is a string - parsing it all the time to figure out calling conventions is ugly at best and incomplete as well, since optional and keyword arguments are not visible (only that optional or rest arguments are at all available). Lambda-info is just a debugging aid, not a reflection mechanism. In the interest of keeping code and heap sizes small I recommend not extending this stuff. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
