On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:59 PM, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit: > > > > So do we make the bold move of not defining (token? x)? > > No, we realize that just as we need only one empty list (unlike Java, where > any list can have zero elements without losing its identity), we need only > one object that has: > > a unique identity, disjoint from all other objects > a unique type, disjoint from all other types > no information inside it >
Why do we need this? I can't remember right now... cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
